Camera faceoff

EOS R6 Mark II vs a7 IV

Canon · Sony

Specs at a glance

Spec

Summary

For filmmakers prioritizing uncropped 4K 60p and external ProRes RAW, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is the clear choice. Hybrid shooters who need higher resolution 33MP stills alongside solid video will lean towards the Sony a7 IV, which also boasts 15 stops of dynamic range.

Which would you pick?

Vote once per day — come back tomorrow to vote again.

Highlights

EOS R6 Mark II

Video Capabilities: 6K 60p and uncropped 4K 60p recording for superior video quality.
Codec Options: External ProRes RAW recording via HDMI offers professional-grade post-production flexibility.
Autofocus: Dual Pixel CMOS AF II provides incredibly reliable and fast subject tracking.
Gamma Profiles: Comprehensive C-Log3, C-Log2, and Canon Log options for extensive grading.

a7 IV

Sensor & Resolution: 33MP Exmor R CMOS sensor delivers higher resolution stills (7008 x 4672).
Dynamic Range: 15 stops of dynamic range provides more latitude in challenging lighting conditions.
Autofocus: Real-time Tracking with 759 phase-detection points for precise subject acquisition.
Ports: Full-size HDMI Type A port is more robust and reliable for professional video setups.

The trade-off

Choosing the EOS R6 Mark II means giving up the a7 IV's 33MP sensor and 15 stops of dynamic range. Choosing the a7 IV means giving up the R6 Mark II's uncropped 4K 60p, 6K 60p, and external ProRes RAW recording.