Camera faceoff

EOS C500 Mark II vs URSA Mini Pro 12K

Canon · Blackmagic Design

Specs at a glance

Spec

Summary

For productions demanding reliable autofocus, superior low-light performance from a full-frame sensor, and Canon's renowned color science, the EOS C500 Mark II is the clear choice. However, if maximum resolution, flexible codec options with Blackmagic RAW, and a more budget-friendly price point are paramount, the URSA Mini Pro 12K stands alone.

Which would you pick?

Vote once per day — come back tomorrow to vote again.

Highlights

EOS C500 Mark II

Sensor & Image Quality: Full-Frame CMOS sensor (38.1 x 20.1 mm) for shallow depth of field and excellent low light.
Autofocus: Dual Pixel CMOS AF provides precise and reliable subject tracking.
Dynamic Range: 15+ stops of dynamic range offers extensive grading latitude.
Built-in Features: Built-in motorized ND filters (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 stops) for quick exposure control.
Codec & Workflow: Cinema RAW Light and XF-AVC (H.264) for flexible post-production.

URSA Mini Pro 12K

Resolution: Revolutionary 12K Super 35 CMOS sensor (12288 x 6480) for extreme detail and reframing.
Frame Rates: High frame rates up to 12K DCI 60 fps, 8K DCI 120 fps, and 4K DCI 240 fps.
Codec & Workflow: Blackmagic RAW and ProRes codecs for efficient, high-quality post-production.
Lens Versatility: Interchangeable lens mounts (PL, EF, B4, F) for unparalleled lens compatibility.
Price Point: Significantly lower MSRP at $9995 compared to the C500 Mark II's $15999.

The trade-off

Choosing the EOS C500 Mark II means sacrificing the URSA Mini Pro 12K's extreme 12K resolution and native Blackmagic RAW codec. Opting for the URSA Mini Pro 12K means giving up Canon's reliable Dual Pixel CMOS AF, a full-frame sensor, and the C500 Mark II's 15+ stops of dynamic range.