Camera faceoff

X-H2 vs a7 IV

Fujifilm · Sony

Specs at a glance

Spec

Summary

For filmmakers prioritizing internal 8K recording and robust codec options like Apple ProRes, the Fujifilm X-H2 is the clear choice. However, if a full-frame sensor, superior low-light performance, and 15 stops of dynamic range are paramount, the Sony a7 IV delivers a more cinematic image.

Which would you pick?

Vote once per day — come back tomorrow to vote again.

Highlights

X-H2

Sensor & Image Science: 40.2MP APS-C BSI CMOS sensor delivers exceptional detail and resolution.
Video Capabilities: Internal 8K/30p, 4K/60p, and 1080p/240p recording options.
Professional Codecs: Supports internal Apple ProRes and Blackmagic RAW for flexible post-production.
Connectivity: Features a full-size HDMI Type A port for reliable external monitoring.

a7 IV

Sensor & Image Science: Full-Frame Exmor R CMOS sensor provides superior low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Dynamic Range: Offers an impressive 15 stops of dynamic range for extensive highlight and shadow recovery.
Autofocus System: Advanced Real-time Tracking with 759 phase-detection points ensures reliable subject tracking.
Low Light Performance: Full-frame sensor and excellent ISO range (100–51200) excel in challenging lighting.

The trade-off

Choosing the X-H2 means giving up the full-frame sensor and 15 stops of dynamic range found in the a7 IV. Choosing the a7 IV means giving up internal 8K/30p recording and professional codecs like Apple ProRes and Blackmagic RAW.